Source vs source, laid out.
Two proposals, two policies, two vendors — where they differ, who wins on which criterion.
a vs b
loadproposal-A · proposal-B
compareon your criteria
diff3 real differences found
✓each claim cites its side
Why it's good
Stop re-reading twelve pages to find the three that matter.
Keep both versions as topics and ask. Om-E reads them side by side and pulls out the real differences — where they disagree, who wins on which criterion — with each claim pointing back to its side.
01
Real differences only
The noise both documents share is skipped; what actually diverges surfaces.
02
On your criteria
Price, security posture, retention terms — the comparison runs on axes you pick.
03
Claims cite their side
Every difference points to the exact spot in each source that proves it.
04
It saves as a matrix
The comparison lands back in your KB as a topic — reusable in the decision memo.